imbadpython: i feel like clash of code problems quality are dropping
imbadpython: so many are like tedious
PurCHES5: yep too easy
PurCHES5: It was way harder back in the day
imbadpython: yes
TheSpiffiest: Does anyone do these in Rust?
imbadpython: @mafiron wtf ;-;
imbadpython: i think a lot do in ruby (especially for shortest/code golf)
imbadpython: rust idk
TheSpiffiest: As frustrating as that damn compiler is I think I might do it to get faster
TheSpiffiest: I just started. The first few I got 0% because I didn't really get where all the buttons and tests were
imbadpython: nice
TheSpiffiest: Have any of you gotten jobs from here?
vuhoanganh: :v
vuhoanganh: ez game ?
vuhoanganh: where are u from ?
Zerplin: anyone done the Dice probability calculator puzzle?
vuhoanganh: ML ?
Zerplin: how did you get started on parsing the arithmetic expression
imbadpython: what do you mean
imbadpython: use a stack
Zerplin: did you do the Dice probability calculator
Zerplin: puzzle?
imbadpython: yes
imbadpython: well no but ik how to do
imbadpython: let me do real quick
imbadpython: have you learned stack before?
imbadpython: if not just look it up
imbadpython: or this
imbadpython: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunting-yard_algorithm
Zerplin: i know about stack
imbadpython: ye so you first parse it into reverse polish notation
imbadpython: with a queue and stack
imbadpython: then use a stack to evaluate
imbadpython: and just loop through all d4
imbadpython: that's how i do it might be overcomplicating it xD
imbadpython: if you using python this can help you
imbadpython: s = input()
for t in '+-*>':
s = s.replace(t, ' ' + t + ' ')
s = s.split()
Zerplin: using c# atm
imbadpython: oh then just ye do sth similar
imbadpython: there are other ways
Zerplin: yeah, was maybe thinking some recurssion
imbadpython: in python i can probably use eval but ill do it proper way
imbadpython: ill send you code
imbadpython: one sec
Zerplin: it's tempting to use js or python, but i'm doing the puzzle to get better at c#
MinhNhut: :joy:
imbadpython: im struggling ;-;
imbadpython: maybe i should just use eval >:(
imbadpython: why the fuck are there brackets
imbadpython: ye ok good luck man
imbadpython: <3
Zerplin: brackets?
Zerplin: do you mean parantheses?
imbadpython: ye
TheSpiffiest: Ah, learning
TheSpiffiest: Didn't realize python title was the same as capitalize
imbadpython: title capitalizes each letter after space as well
imbadpython: capitalize only does it for the start
imbadpython: so "abc def".capitalize is "Abc def"
imbadpython: but "abc def".title is "Abc Def"
imbadpython: I think
imbadpython: pretty sure
anid: Yes
imbadpython: cool
TheSpiffiest: I could have done the whole snake cake to camel case in one liner now
TheSpiffiest: s[0]+s.replace("_"," ").title().replace(" ","")[1:]
TheSpiffiest: I did a for loop for each word
imbadpython: what's the quesiton
imbadpython: just give an example i think i can guess it
TheSpiffiest: convert snake_case to camelCase
imbadpython: xd
imbadpython: oo
imbadpython: ye yours is good
TheSpiffiest: some_long_variables_ to to someLongVariables
imbadpython: debugging is gay
imbadpython: you too
tomatoes: no need for splitting by space
tomatoes: "some_long_variables".title() = "Some_Long_Variables"
TheSpiffiest: Even better
TheSpiffiest: s[0]+s.title().replace("_","")[1:]
imbadpython: holy shit im done
imbadpython: dice probability calculator :D
imbadpython: lmao
imbadpython: took long enough
imbadpython: https://pastebin.com/yynEZzb6 code review anyone
imbadpython: i am the second person to implement the evaluation function instead of using eval in python lmao
imbadpython: kinda waste of time
badAtCoding: imbadpython youre skilled
imbadpython: hmm
imbadpython: i guess you too then
badAtCoding: nope
badAtCoding: how long youve been doing py?
RAPHI: Is it just my internet or is Coc validaton really slow today ?
Alexle: i need helpy help with this tic-tac-toe thing
gloomix: Hey guys. I'm doing the ANEO sponsored puzzle and quite frankly I think their test cases are wrong.
gloomix: anybody else had that feeling?
imbadpython: its correct
tanmaycodernovice: RAPHI well done.. just 7 escond gap
Alexle: need help with the ASCII art one in the easy section
tanmaycodernovice: same
tanmaycodernovice: me too
Alexle: the hint doesn't help too
tanmaycodernovice: exactly
tanmaycodernovice: how is scoring based in this
tanmaycodernovice: coc
DJZombieMysteryInSpace_6e20: Hello! :)
Tim_McSim: Such a lovely place this is!
jacek: where
Tim_McSim: This website.
jacek: really :o
tanmaycodernovice: 2
47
Output
2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47
tanmaycodernovice: can someone code this
HaBao: hi
jacek: prime numbers?
tanmaycodernovice: print the prime numbers between these 2 number
tanmaycodernovice: yes
tanmaycodernovice: i'm using print(num,end=' ') which is orpinting a space at the end
tanmaycodernovice: as a result unable to pass test cases
Tim_McSim: I'm pretty new in programming, but having so much fun solving the puzzles.
jacek: so add those numbers to the temporary string and print(string.strip())
tanmaycodernovice: now its over actually
tanmaycodernovice: but thanks
jacek: oO
AntiSquid: maybe do it yourself next time tanmaycodernovice, so ungrateful
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: hi
xalpha7: hi
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: hello
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: hi
xalpha7: are you new?
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: yes
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: who are you
xalpha7: me too
xalpha7: just an user
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: where are you from
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: im korea
xalpha7: form soul?
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: no pohang
xalpha7: okay in got it
xalpha7: i m form india btw
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: wow india
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: india's math is good
xalpha7: yup bruh
TheRustyKnight_8e5b: good luck bye
xalpha7: okay
xalpha7: gd luck too
xalpha7: bye
Uljahn: Automaton2000: who are you?
Automaton2000: was just curious if anyone has any idea what the problem is that my code is
-Gamma-: Automaton2000, where are you?
Automaton2000: i didn't use it in the right direction?
-Gamma-: you didnt
NgonTran: hello everyone
jacek: ohai
MSmits: hey guys, I have a question about oware
MSmits: if you are playing your last turn
MSmits: does it matter that the opponent can't do a move after that?
MSmits: can you play moves that leave the opponent with no move of his own
MSmits: also when there is no such moves, does he lose all his seeds even though the game has ended?
MSmits: by last turn i mean turn 200 of course
jacek: you dont read statements? :V
MSmits: does it say this?
darkhorse64: You cannot play a move that starves your opponent. If your opponent is strarved you must play a move that feeds him. The opponent loses all remaining seeds to not his own
MSmits: yes
MSmits: but what if there is no next turn
MSmits: i am talking about the last turn of the game
jacek: i think the seeds are not capturd in last turn
MSmits: yes, but you dont know for sure
MSmits: how do we know for sure
jacek: replay https://www.codingame.com/replay/473431216
MSmits: doesnt tell me anything
darkhorse64: I understand your question. Does these rules aplly on the very last turn. Honestly, I do not know. And I do not know whether the referee enforces these rules on the very last turn
jacek: in the replay, 200 turn occurs and the final score without seeds in houses is final
MSmits: yes but you did not try to play a move that leaves the opponent no move
MSmits: also you did not capture all his seeds because he had no move on turn 201
MSmits: so you didnt test it
jacek: oh hmm
MSmits: this is really an implementation detail for which we need to see the referee
darkhorse64: ^
Astrobytes: The referee is linked in the forum thread
MSmits: cool
MSmits: will go look at it
jacek: oware is so last week. do othello
Astrobytes: lol
MSmits: i will eventually :)
Astrobytes: afk for a bit, catch you guys later
MSmits: http://chat.codingame.com/pastebin/8ad07e2f-eba6-44cc-b119-e2a85bf542fa
MSmits: I think this says that you cant play actions that leave the opponent without a move, even if it is the last move you make because of turn limit
MSmits: so that answers my first question
MSmits: http://chat.codingame.com/pastebin/c7a8d6dd-1ac5-419b-a342-f5648b93d35f
MSmits: this says that the last turn you still get to capture all his seeds
MSmits: even if he doesnt need to move after that
MSmits: so there is no exception needed for the last turn
dbdr: MSmits: to know for sure, read the referee source :)
dbdr: sorry, you are :)
MSmits: yeah, i didnt at first know there was a shared referee
MSmits: because its not in the statement
MSmits: which is a bit weird
jacek: they wanted to hide boss
jacek: ?
MSmits: no idea
jacek: and yet im 2nd :F https://i.imgur.com/sQi7Qsr.png
darkhorse64: resubmit
MSmits: this is othello?
darkhorse64: Yep
MSmits: cool
jacek: eeyup
jacek: no mcts
MSmits: why not
MSmits: you said no mcts on Onitama :P
jacek: im too dump to reliably incorporate eval to mcts
MSmits: maybe you dont need eval
jacek: i think it worked in oware by accident
jacek: given how fixed are my replays with agade
MSmits: oware is extremely RPS
MSmits: but eval surely works
MSmits: mcts with eval that is
eulerscheZahl: give up and play another gmae
eulerscheZahl: game
MSmits: yavalath?
imbadpython: what you guys talking about
jacek: yinsh
struct: hello
MostComplicatedUsername: jrke what's episode 2 of lost child???? He gets even more lost?????
MSmits: maybe he gets lost in a different way?
MSmits: first he is just lost
MSmits: the second time people "lose" him
MostComplicatedUsername: lol
jacek: lost The Game
Astrobytes: The Game?
Astrobytes: hey jacek, how the hell are you not 1st yet
jacek: i can win with tric but i started to lose with losers
jacek: like some cat
jacek: but not to worry, i pulled him down a little bit
Astrobytes: Hey it's only like 1 game per submit :P
You timed out against Eric too
jacek: time out?
jacek: oh yeah
jacek: hmm
jacek: im using 145ms
jacek: i wish it said if this is some error or really timeout
Astrobytes: Server maybe
Astrobytes: Yeah it's super annoying
Astrobytes: Does it affect your bot much if you reduce to 140?
jacek: dunno
Astrobytes: cause most of the spikes due to the server are less than 10ms usually
struct: Is this spike issue recent?
Astrobytes: No, it's pretty constant. I remember it was really bad for a while, when we were getting huge spikes in CSB
struct: Its strange
struct: I use all the time allowed in uttt and stc
struct: and no timeouts
Astrobytes: Just a few ms here and there
eulerscheZahl: hi struct. you reported a bug at uploading a contribution. did it get fixed?
struct: I think so
eulerscheZahl: "Please wait, we are building your project..."
struct: It worked past a few hours
struct: I guess its random :(
struct: report it again I guess
eulerscheZahl: meh
zizo1337: It seems in C# Function Append of Stack<T> does not do anything.
zizo1337: Tried that locally too.
jacek: append on stack? not push?
zizo1337: Push works.
Astrobytes: ...
jacek: ???
jacek: i left to 140ms
imbadpython: what you guys talking about
imbadpython: also can someone look at my contribution? (clash of code challenge) i don't understand why it's downvoted so much
imbadpython: and no one has given constructive feedback at all yet
Astrobytes: Good score jacek, still losing to tric a fair bit though
jacek: still im too afraid i may cause him to rage quit
imbadpython: what competition you guys talking about
Astrobytes: :D
Astrobytes: Othello imbadpython
jacek: the game, not the puzzle
Astrobytes: Multiplayer not a contest
struct: Does he still find win before you jacek?
imbadpython: is the game about execution speed
imbadpython: sounds hard
Astrobytes: https://www.codingame.com/multiplayer/bot-programming/othello-1
MSmits: why would you cause tric trac to rage quit jacek?
MSmits: he seems emotionally stable ?
imbadpython: is AlkhilJohn a bot
Astrobytes: Yes.
imbadpython: oh
Astrobytes: imbadpython, read this. It explains why there are bots in clashes:
https://www.codingame.com/blog/clash-of-code-time-has-come-for-clash/
imbadpython: ahhh
imbadpython: that's pretty cool
imbadpython: "I understand it can be frustrating to play against people who manage to complete a Clash in less than 20 seconds, but there is most likely no cheating involved." shit that sounds exactly like me
imbadpython: also the captcha is kinda bad
imbadpython: isn'tt here like captcha v3
imbadpython: like auto captcha
Astrobytes: imbadpython The captcha is there to prevent people writing bots to auto-submit solutions
imbadpython: ye but doesn't google have captcha v3
imbadpython: you don't need to click images anymore
imbadpython: its like it looks at your cursor movement or sth
imbadpython: cuz the images i swear captcha takes more time than the actual CoC round
Astrobytes: It is what it is.
imbadpython: like i mean they can just update it
imbadpython: but ok
jacek: MSmits of course, this is only explanation why im losing to him... *ekhm* why i still allow him to win with me
jacek: struct i think we find the win/lose at the same time
jrke: im trying to add sim in PCR can any body make me explain its physics
eulerscheZahl: sure: how do physics work? explain it to me!
jacek: if we only had physics teacher in the chat :thinking:
jrke: i mean what is movement etc
eulerscheZahl: or jacek in the box
eulerscheZahl: "can any body make me explain"
the stage is yours, start explaining
jrke: i mean what is movement *speed* etc
eulerscheZahl: seems i can't make him explain :(
jrke: :slight_smile:
jacek: D:
TheSpiffiest: Speed is distance per unit of time
jacek: finally! :tada:
jrke: no the speed used in PCR
jrke: i know Speed=distance/time
jacek: uh oh tric responds
Astrobytes: gg anyway jacek
TheSpiffiest: For which meaning of PCR?
TheSpiffiest: I'm thinking polymerase chain reaction in genetics
jacek: https://www.codingame.com/multiplayer/bot-programming/poker-chip-race
Astrobytes: tric's submit is not looking good for you jacek
dbdr: trictrac did you have something ready, waiting for jacek to take #1?
trictrac: yes
jacek: :scream:
Astrobytes: Pretty sure that's a yes
Astrobytes: ah lol
dbdr: :smirk:
jacek: you fool! this isnt my final form!
Astrobytes: :D
Astrobytes: Very strong bots, both of you
Astrobytes: nice work
JoachimNapias1: Hi, in the section "Learn" when i click on a "run" it put waiting indefinitely
jacek: puzzle?
JoachimNapias1: it is just on my computer?
jacek: try to refresh page
Astrobytes: Learn takes you to tech.io
Astrobytes: well, the tech.io content
Astrobytes: JoachimNapias1 try going to tech.io and running it there
JoachimNapias1: i try but same effect :/
Astrobytes: Do any of them work? (try another playground other than the one you're trying now)
Astrobytes: Title defended successfully jacek, gg
jacek: good, im not gonna rage quit
Astrobytes: lol
jacek: maybe if i learned how to play othello, it would be better :thinking:
trictrac: I have an other parameter to try I will resubmit
Astrobytes: :)
TheSpiffiest: Interesting. I'm still doing pod racing... I don't know PCR yet, but I'll figure that out this week. :)
TheSpiffiest: I'm going to have to implement bezier curves to win the races I think
Snef: what league are you ?
TheSpiffiest: bronze right now, but just started this morning
TheSpiffiest: just tweaking paramters
jacek: :s
struct: dark horse64 just sent me the boss, I will add it soon
Astrobytes: better improve now jacek
dbdr: was that the boss that was better than his main bot?
Astrobytes: That's a *very* strong submit by trictrac
dbdr: after removing features?
Astrobytes: nice struct
struct: I dont know dbd r
Astrobytes: Looking good dbdr!
darkhorse64: To make a long story short, there is something fishy with my solver. When I remove it, it make my bot stronger.
darkhorse64: *makes*
dbdr: thanks Astrobytes!
Astrobytes: That's not really what a solver is supposed to do darkhorse64 :P
dbdr: debugging time darkhorse64
b1l4l: {
struct: "Please wait, we are building your project..." :(
struct: Still happens
Astrobytes: Have you been saving this bot for the right moment dbdr? :D
darkhorse64: I spent the afternoon on it without success. That's the main issue with MCTS: it's very hard to debug when it goes wrong
dbdr: yes, learning from trictrac ;)
trictrac: dbdr your bot seems to work good !!
jacek: :F
Astrobytes: gg man, well played
dbdr: also, I have a huge bug in my eval
Astrobytes: God help us all
dbdr: I *had*
Astrobytes: Ah
dbdr: unfortunately :D
jacek: mcts?
dbdr: minimax
struct: I guess the boss submit wont happen today
struct: Since cg is stuck again
dbdr: struct: eulerscheZahl was saying this happens
struct: yeah
struct: same happened last week
dbdr: just need to retry
struct: nah
struct: "
Oups
An error occurred (#INVALID_PARAMETERS): "Invalid parameters"."
Astrobytes: Time to delete
struct: O.o
jacek: restart account
Astrobytes: :D
struct: Ok now its tottaly broken
Astrobytes: invalid parameters are "invalid parameters", interesting
darkhorse64: You break CG ?
Astrobytes: Hey it's pretty good at doing that by itself
struct: Do you also want the wood 2 boss to be the default AI?
struct: or it doesn't matter?
Astrobytes: That's a good idea I think
jacek: i feel so noob :c
dbdr: is that an insult jacek? ;)
Reksio: :)
dbdr: (towards me I mean)
jacek: how can i lose to such lowlings!?
Astrobytes: lol rekt
dbdr: :innocent:
jacek: phew
dbdr: gonna be close
Astrobytes: lol, it heard you
dbdr: or not
Astrobytes: Very strong submit regardless, gg
dbdr: I lost to "lowlings" ;)
dbdr: yes, happy to have made it work finally
struct: Boss will be a quite strong too
Astrobytes: Yeah, I meant to ask, is this boss gonna destroy everyone except #1
jacek: i dont remember submiting boss, so no
dbdr: add solver to the boss to weaken it ;)
Astrobytes: hahaha
struct: Will top 8 be too strong?
struct: for first league?
struct: I dont want to add multiple
jacek: imo boss should be just better than random moves
Astrobytes: You were going for around 30pts cutoff no?
dbdr: I like strong bosses
Astrobytes: ^
struct: Maybe top 10?
Astrobytes: Sense of achievement
dbdr: nice challenge, even if you don't compete for the top 3
dbdr: not many people have really worked on it yet
dbdr: level will improve
struct: I guess you are right
struct: I will leave it as it is
struct: I don't have any game ready yet after this
struct: I have prototype of Amazons
struct: But I'm currently working on other stuff
jacek: i submitted good bot and suddenly there are bunch better
Astrobytes: All good struct, take your time and prioritise what you have to!
Astrobytes: jacek - they were waiting in the shadows for you
struct: Just wait until Msmits submit
struct: :smiling_imp:
Astrobytes: At least you have a few weeks before that
struct: Is he a fan of minimax though?
struct: mcts doesnt seem to be doing so well here
simpledark: yo guys
jacek: mcts isnt thing for othell until MSmits will come
TheSpiffiest: silver league yeah! :)
TheSpiffiest: What does
Promotion to Gold League in :
01H 19MN 07S mean?
TheSpiffiest: Do I have to do anything or is it going to put me in gold in an hour?
darkhorse64: Just wait
darkhorse64: pcr ,
darkhorse64: ?
Astrobytes: CSB
Astrobytes: Someone found -3vel
Astrobytes: :P
darkhorse64: Yet another 1000 promotions ?
struct: TheSpiffiest you have to wait 1 hour
Astrobytes: Server death incoming
TheSpiffiest: Thanks. I'll play some other games I guess. I like this site.
NASADeveloper102: I finally submitted my bot for Ghost in the Cell.
Astrobytes: gg TheSpiffiest
Astrobytes: nice NASADeveloper102
Astrobytes: How is it?
NASADeveloper102: It's....
NASADeveloper102: Buggy, but I'll fix it later.
Astrobytes: Well, Rome wasn't built in a day and all that
NASADeveloper102: I guess.
TheSpiffiest: NASADeveloper102 - are you actually working for NASA? Any interesting projects? :)
NASADeveloper102: No, I aspire to work there though.
struct: Must solve mars lander
dbdr: struct: why is the puzzle name othello-1?
Astrobytes: Yeah, get on the Mars Lander series
TheSpiffiest: Same here. :)
NASADeveloper102: What is the Mars Lander series?
struct: dbdr because there is already a puzzle named othello :(
struct: https://www.codingame.com/training/medium/othello
dbdr: oh. no big deal!
TheSpiffiest: Interviewing for Astrobotic soon I hope! 🤞
Astrobytes: In puzzles section NASADeveloper102, there's Episode 1 2 and 3. Increasing difficulty. Also theres an optimization game based on it
jacek: its a big deal, its a direct ripoff of that puzzle!
jacek: they even have the same background
NASADeveloper102: I see.
NASADeveloper102: But you never actually explained what it is.
Astrobytes: It's what it says. Land the lander on 'Mars' ;)
NASADeveloper102: I see.
TheSpiffiest: Ha! It's the old lunar lander game from like 1980
Astrobytes: First one is ridiculously easy, after that they get more fun
NASADeveloper102: Okay. I'll check it out.
TheSpiffiest: I have a friend at NASA, he's helping me train for a contractor position. I guess they use low level C for everything, which kinda sucks.
Astrobytes: Well, there's a lot of assembly used, alongside FORTRAN, as well as C
jacek: you know what doesnt suck...
Astrobytes: Vacuum cleaner made in...
TheSpiffiest: his specific project is converting OpenCV libraries to radhard stuff for computer vision based docking
Astrobytes: Nice
jacek: oh todays celestia day
Astrobytes: wtf is that
TheSpiffiest: like going backwards, no classes, no boost, just pointers and and includes
jacek: longest day in year
Astrobytes: Summer solstice
jacek: eeyup
TheSpiffiest: aw poop I'm supposed to run today
Astrobytes: You and your MLP jacek
jacek: i dont use multilayer perceptrons
Astrobytes: ...
reCurse: The only sane use of this acronym
Astrobytes: Hey, he's the brony, don't look at me
derjack: who
Astrobytes: lol ffs man
Astrobytes: Hmm dbdr and tomatoes submitting at the same time, it's a Rust conspiracy I tell thee
dbdr: :sunglasses:
tomatoes: it's sure is
Astrobytes: :D
Astrobytes: nice improvement anyway tomatoes
jacek: :E
Astrobytes: dbdr is destroying you jacek. Fix it
jacek: because i let him
Astrobytes: Right, rage quit and all that
JBM: how is ur csb
jacek: meh my eval still isnt perfect
jacek: 0.7+ for win, then next move and proven loss
Astrobytes: What are you eval'ing
jacek: the board :v
Astrobytes: I mean like there's a whole bunch of stuff
Astrobytes: That you can use
jacek: confguration and tanh it as winning probability
jacek: well discs and ther positions
Astrobytes: available moves, stability..?
jacek: N-tuple network learned via temporal difference
Astrobytes: hah really?
jacek: it works wonders for i.e. 2048 http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/wjaskowski/pub/papers/Szubert2014_2048.pdf
jacek: im too dumb to make fast stability disc check or frontiers
jacek: i showed you my eval the other day didnt i
Astrobytes: frontiers isn't hard
jacek: oh my dbdr
dbdr: I think it's mosty luck
dbdr: mostly
Astrobytes: fkin hell man lol
eulerscheZahl: luck of others to not get completely crushed
jacek: someone isnt giving up
Astrobytes: tric never gives up :D
jacek: its breakthrough all over again
struct: oh well
struct: too bad I cant submit the boss :(
struct: Did you manage to upload euler?
Astrobytes: Failing, failing so hard! :D
https://www.codingame.com/replay/473874462
jacek: wow you knew its loss so soon
Astrobytes: ha ha
darkhorse64: Looks like dbdr seriously pissed off trictrac.
Astrobytes: Seriously.
Astrobytes: That's insane.
dbdr: if opponent == "dbdr" {
beMerciless();
}
darkhorse64: Improvement: beMerciless()
Astrobytes: More like, if (opponent) wreck();
dbdr: lol
Astrobytes: trictrac :clap:
trictrac: thanks
trictrac: I introduce TT and reduce pruning
Astrobytes: You did all that before without TT?!
trictrac: yes
Astrobytes: Just eval and a/b?
Astrobytes: (obviously eval)
trictrac: and ordering heuristic
Astrobytes: Impressive man, very impressive
Snef: what is TT ?
Astrobytes: Transposition table Snef
trictrac: Transpostion Table : mémorisation of alphabet result
trictrac: alphabeta
trictrac: based on key of the board
Astrobytes: hashtable with attitude
struct: transposition tables
PatrickMcGinnisII: NASADeveloper102 I tried to work there and for all the subcontractors back in '92, there was a hiring freeze and people with degrees were forced to work in very menial jobs ... it ruined my life's dreams. Wish u luck, but don't get your heart broken.
Astrobytes: Only an hour late there Paddy ;)
PatrickMcGinnisII: yea i saw that, but says they still in chat
PatrickMcGinnisII: Astrobytes that replay hurts, too much white
Astrobytes: lol, I got "rekt"
PatrickMcGinnisII: fixin to do my first submit
LelouchVC2: and i got erectile disfunction
Astrobytes: *dysfunction. Corrected just for you LelouchVC2, as I know you love it
LelouchVC2: my bad, erectile defunktable
Astrobytes: I still reckon you should switch to C or something PatrickMcGinnisII
Astrobytes: I know you love your PHP and all but... realise the potential.
LelouchVC2: C++ > C
PatrickMcGinnisII: I can't do much with MCTS in php, but I can score the board after a few depths
Astrobytes: Yeah, nobody's gonna bite Lelouch
LelouchVC2: That's not even a troll comment
LelouchVC2: just facts
Astrobytes: Whereas in C, you definitely could. So... not hard to port your code PatrickMcGinnisII ;)
PatrickMcGinnisII: don't make me pull out the asm
LelouchVC2: As soon as I got use to assembly they made us code in MIPS
Astrobytes: You got C and C++, with AVX and all sorts, it's all good
PatrickMcGinnisII: Happy fathers day to all the bot daddys!!! You mfers... sry. ;)
LelouchVC2: Thanks dad
Astrobytes: Thanks son
LelouchVC2: A function with factorials and shit took me 139 characters in c++
LelouchVC2: AFTER removing like all the spaces and formatting
LelouchVC2: And it took this bitch 51 in Ruby:
LelouchVC2: x=gets.to_i;puts (x-gets.to_i+1).upto(x).inject(:*)
LelouchVC2: That was his whole code
Andrelamus: and that is why shortest sucks
Astrobytes: Um, yeah. Well why would you choose C++ for clash shortest?
Astrobytes: I don't clash, but, y'know, doesn't take a genius
LelouchVC2: I win C++ with shortest a lot. But when it comes to math equations, these other languages have shortcuts
Astrobytes: Use the right tool for the job
LelouchVC2: Thats why I used a hammer to get my point accross
Astrobytes: Anyway, you can choose languages now in clashes so I see, private ones anyway
LelouchVC2: Bash my ideas into the skulls of my enemies
LelouchVC2: I thought I was talking to the other guy the whole time AstroBytes
Astrobytes: So no more complaints.
LelouchVC2: I've been bamboozled
struct: to bad that his ruby code is not even optimal
struct: can even be shorter
LelouchVC2: Ruby is gay
LelouchVC2: any language that has "(:*)" is gay
Astrobytes: Very mature criticism.
LelouchVC2: Thanks, it took years to refine
LelouchVC2: A black guy walks into a bar
LelouchVC2: And nothing happens because @Equality
Astrobytes: Anyway, I'm out, got an appointment with Saul Goodman and a cheese toastie
LelouchVC2: You've been seeing Saul alot
Astrobytes: gn
Snef: gn
LelouchVC2: Should i be jealous?
LelouchVC2: Damn, ignored
Bangatron: hey guys, sorry to interrupt, but I'm doing the CodeBusters challenge and I notice some people get their Busters to say stuff... Any idea how to do that?
PatrickMcGinnisII: How many C++ programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
LelouchVC2: 3, 1 to solve the problem, 1 to code it, and the other to hire someone to do it
struct: Bangatron I think you need to output followed by the message
struct: MOVE 213 123 message
Bangatron: orly? I'll check that out right away, thx! n.n
Bangatron: o wow yea that works! Thank you so much, struct!! 😊
struct: yw
PatrickMcGinnisII: hopefully none, they just reuse it. But in reality it takes all night to realize the class is protected
PatrickMcGinnisII: <insert exception throw() here>
PatrickMcGinnisII: only 30 othello users
PatrickMcGinnisII: the 5 people below me are lazy
PatrickMcGinnisII: ok back to the real world
PatrickMcGinnisII: glhf
PatrickMcGinnisII: 0 cp for 41/74 in search race, what is this world coming to
struct: Hmm
struct: you should get some
struct: after it updates
Snef: PatrickMcGinnisII you also seems to be lazy (for Othello)
mashmallow: ize(); i++)
Reksio: are c# puzzles compiled with unsafe flag? I think it supposed to be on..
Reksio: Does anyone know anything about it it being off?
Reksio: actually even if I don't use Unsafe code Span<T> is not visible to the compiler. Aren't puzzles running on .net core 2.1+ ?
struct: net 4.7 according to faq
struct: and yes it uses -unsafe
struct: C# 7.0 (Mono 6.4.0, .NET 4.7)
Compiled with ‑unsafe
Reksio: well, it is not. At least not for old puzzles
Reksio: otherwise it would understand Span<T> I suppose
Reksio: My specific puzzle is Chuck Norris
Reksio: for reference
struct: Well printing version returns 4.0.30319.42000
struct: So I don't know :(
Reksio: It's probably running on lambda or something of sort and they didn't change env for old ones. Probably new puzzles run on new .net.
Mysterrion: Join guys https://www.codingame.com/clashofcode/clash/12648006e11e62f8934d0b4ac83faed9e0b0656
c0cainee: no
Mysterrion: K
Reksio: Is there a preferred list of puzzles which should be done on each difficulty before moving to higher difficulty?
badAtCoding: c0cainee can you publish your solution?
badAtCoding: nevermind.. thanks
LelouchVC2: cocaine can do anything
badAtCoding: i can see that ):
c0cainee: I do share all my solutions when I get them right
imbadpython: i feel like clash of code problems quality are dropping
